English Test Practice

IELTS Writing Task 1 (Academic): structure, criteria and a model answer

Last updated · ETP Editorial Team · 10 min read

In IELTS Writing Task 1 (Academic) you describe a graph, table, chart, map, process or diagram in your own words, writing at least 150 words in about 20 minutes. Include a clear overview of the main trends, which the Band 7 Task Achievement descriptor requires. Task 2 counts twice as much, so do not overrun.

Key facts

  • Task 1: at least 150 words in about 20 minutes. Task 2: at least 250 words in about 40 minutes, within one 60-minute test.
  • Task 2 counts twice as much as Task 1 towards your Writing band score.
  • Four criteria: Task Achievement, Coherence and Cohesion, Lexical Resource, Grammatical Range and Accuracy.
  • Responses of 20 words or fewer are rated at Band 1, and any copied rubric is discounted.
  • There is no maximum word count, but a very short answer may not show enough language for the higher bands.

What Writing Task 1 asks for

Everything you need is on the page. According to ielts.org, all the information for Task 1 is in the graph, chart, table or diagram, so the task tests whether you can select the important points, not what you know about the topic.

You have about 20 minutes to write at least 150 words, in full sentences, because IELTS does not accept answers written as notes or bullet points.

Line graphs show change over time and bar charts compare categories. The other formats you may see are these:

  • Pie chart: proportions of a whole.
  • Table: exact figures that you sort and group yourself.
  • Map: how a place has changed over time, or a plan for future changes.
  • Process diagram: the stages of a natural or manufacturing process.
  • Combined visuals: for example, a line graph plus a pie chart.

For maps and processes, describe the main changes or main stages instead of main trends. The structure stays the same.

A four-paragraph structure that examiners can follow

IDP's summary of the band descriptors describes Band 5 Task Achievement like this: there may be a tendency to focus on details without referring to the bigger picture. This layout builds the overview in, so you cannot skip it:

  • Introduction (one sentence): say what the visual shows, where and when, in your own words. Any copied rubric is discounted, so copied words do not count towards your 150.
  • Overview (one or two sentences): the biggest trend, the highest and lowest values, or the clearest contrast. No figures are needed.
  • Body paragraph 1: one group of related data, with figures and comparisons.
  • Body paragraph 2: the other group, in the same way.

Task 1 is a report, so there is no opinion, recommendation or essay-style conclusion. The overview may go at the end, as long as it sums up the data.

Group the data before you write. The Band 7 Task Achievement wording asks for data that are 'appropriately categorised', and logical grouping also helps Coherence and Cohesion. Put items that behave alike together, such as rising lines in one paragraph and falling lines in the other, rather than following the order on the chart.

How the four criteria apply to a report

Only the first criterion changes between the two tasks. Cambridge lists Task achievement/response, Coherence and cohesion, Lexical resource, and Grammatical range and accuracy, with Task 1 marked for achievement. Its Band 7 wording asks for a clear overview, which no amount of good English can replace.

CriterionWhat it checks in Task 1A common way to lose marks
Task AchievementWhether you cover the main features, give an overview and report the data accuratelyListing every number without an overview
Coherence and CohesionLogical grouping, clear paragraphs, linking words and referencingWriting one long block, or using 'Firstly, Secondly' mechanically
Lexical ResourceRange and precision of vocabulary for trends, proportions and comparisonsRepeating 'increase' throughout, or copying phrases from the prompt
Grammatical Range and AccuracyA mix of simple and complex sentences, with control of comparatives and tensesUsing the wrong tense for past data, or making errors with comparatives

Examiners use the public IELTS Writing Band Descriptors, updated in May 2023. The full wording shows what separates each band from the next.

The overview is what separates band 6 from band 7

At Band 6 a relevant overview is 'attempted'; at Band 7 it is 'clear'. At Band 5 there may be no real overview at all.

BandTask Achievement wording on the overviewWhat it looks like on the page
5There may be a tendency to focus on details (without referring to the bigger picture).Paragraphs of figures, with no sentence that sums up the chart
6A relevant overview is attempted.An overview is there but vague, for example 'There were many changes over the period.'
7Presents a clear overview, the data are appropriately categorised, and main trends or differences are identified.A sentence that names the main trend and the main contrast, with the body paragraphs grouped logically

At Band 8, features must be 'skilfully selected'. A quick test: if someone reading only your overview could not sketch the rough shape of the chart, it is probably still at the 'attempted' level.

Word count: a floor, no ceiling and two edge rules

Cambridge says you will not be penalised for writing more than 150 words, and Task 1 has no maximum. The minimum is handled in less obvious ways:

  • Responses of 20 words or fewer are rated at Band 1.
  • Any copied rubric is discounted, so a 160-word answer that opens with a sentence copied from the prompt may have fewer than 150 words of your own.
  • Cambridge warns that a short answer may not show enough of the language needed for higher bands.
  • Writing that does not relate to the topic is penalised, so memorised paragraphs are risky.

Aim for clearly more than 150 words of your own, and treat extra length as a cost, for the timing reasons below.

Why a long Task 1 costs you more than it earns

Every extra minute on Task 1 comes out of the task that counts twice as much. The 60-minute Writing test covers both tasks, and Task 2 needs at least 250 words in about 40 minutes.

Here is an illustration using the 2:1 weighting. Candidate A scores 7 on Task 1 and 6 on a finished Task 2: (7 + 6 + 6) ÷ 3 ≈ 6.3. Candidate B polishes Task 1 to 7.5 but rushes Task 2 and scores 5: (7.5 + 5 + 5) ÷ 3 ≈ 5.8. The extra half band on Task 1 adds about 0.17, while the lost band on Task 2 takes away about 0.67.

The overall band is the average of the four section scores, weighted equally and rounded to the nearest half band. The IELTS band score calculator shows how your Writing score combines with the other three.

A model answer marked against each criterion

This answer is not a Band 9 showpiece. ETP wrote the prompt, data and answer to be possible in 20 minutes, and we estimate its band honestly.

Worked example

Question. The table shows the number of visitors (in thousands) to three museums in Harbourton, a fictional city, in 2004, 2008, 2012 and 2016. Science Museum: 420, 510, 600, 680. Art Gallery: 380, 360, 330, 290. History Museum: 250, 260, 270, 275. Write a report of at least 150 words that picks out the key points and compares the three museums.

Answer. The table compares annual visitor numbers at three museums in Harbourton at four-year intervals between 2004 and 2016. Overall, the Science Museum became by far the most visited of the three, while attendance at the Art Gallery declined steadily and the History Museum remained broadly stable throughout the period. In 2004, the Science Museum and the Art Gallery attracted similar numbers of visitors, at 420,000 and 380,000 respectively. Over the following twelve years, though, their paths diverged sharply. Visits to the Science Museum rose at every interval, reaching 680,000 in 2016, which was well over double the figure for the History Museum in the same year. By contrast, the Art Gallery lost visitors in each period, ending at 290,000. The History Museum was the least popular attraction in 2004, with 250,000 visitors, and it changed very little afterwards, edging up to 275,000 by 2016. As a result, it had almost caught up with the Art Gallery by the end of the period, when only 15,000 visitors separated the two.

Why. The answer is 169 words, all in the writer's own words. The introduction paraphrases the prompt instead of copying it. Paragraph two is an overview that names all three trends without using any figures. The body paragraphs group the data by behaviour: first the two museums that moved in opposite directions, then the stable one. Each paragraph compares the museums instead of listing numbers.

CriterionStrengthsLimitsOur estimate
Task AchievementClear overview; all three museums covered; accurate figures; comparisons such as 'well over double' and the 15,000 gapThe 2008 and 2012 figures are only implied ('at every interval', 'in each period')Band 7, close to 8
Coherence and CohesionData grouped by trend; referencing such as 'their paths' and 'the two'Linking words are predictable ('by contrast', 'as a result')Band 7
Lexical ResourcePrecise phrases: 'diverged sharply', 'edging up', 'broadly stable'Museum names repeated often; few alternatives for 'visitors'Band 7
Grammatical Range and AccuracyRelative and participle clauses ('reaching 680,000'), comparatives, no errorsSentence patterns are similar across the body paragraphsBand 7

Our overall estimate is Band 7, and an examiner could reasonably score Task Achievement higher. Wider, more precise vocabulary and more varied sentences would raise the other criteria; more words would not.

A self-check list for the final minutes

Check the overview first (main trend and main contrast, no figures), then the introduction (nothing copied from the prompt). Then go through the rest:

  • Does each body paragraph group related data?
  • Are the figures and units accurate?
  • Have you compared the data, not just listed it?
  • Do your tenses match the time frame, including forms such as 'is expected to' for projections?
  • Have you left out opinions, causes and recommendations?
  • Is everything in full sentences?
  • Have you written clearly more than 150 words of your own?

Practising Task 1 under timed conditions

Untimed practice cannot show whether you can finish Task 1 in about 20 minutes, the time IELTS suggests. Set a 20-minute timer, write your report, then go straight to a Task 2 prompt for the remaining 40 minutes.

For full-length timed practice, use the IELTS practice test. The full mock tests in a pass follow test timing, and passes last 30, 60 or 90 days (see pricing). The free IELTS level test takes 20 minutes but covers only Reading and Listening, so it will not tell you anything about your Writing.

Frequently asked questions

If I put my overview at the end, will the examiner treat it as a conclusion?

That is fine as long as it sums up the main trends or differences and gives no opinion. Task 1 needs no essay-style conclusion. Putting the overview second means it is already written if time runs short.

Will I lose marks for writing more than 150 words?

No. Cambridge says you will not be penalised for this. A longer Task 1 does leave less time for Task 2, which counts twice as much towards your Writing band score.

If I reuse the question's wording in my introduction, do those words count towards 150?

No. Any copied rubric is discounted, so a copied opening sentence can leave a 160-word answer with fewer than 150 words of your own. Paraphrase instead.

How many figures from a table should I mention?

Only those that support your main points: the highest and lowest values, the biggest changes and the clearest comparisons. Detail without the bigger picture is typical of Band 5 Task Achievement.

What should I do if I am still writing Task 1 after 20 minutes?

Finish the paragraph you are on and move to Task 2. Task 2 needs at least 250 words in about 40 minutes, and every minute you overrun comes out of the task that counts more.

Can I use bullet points to list the stages of a process diagram?

No. IELTS says you must write in full sentences, not notes or bullet points. Describe the stages in paragraphs, using sequencing words to show the order.

Sources